在花费预算、放置曲目或发送面向客户的推荐之前，快速进行播放列表风险审查。
专为音乐营销人员、推广团队和独立唱片公司打造。
使用公开播放列表链接以获得最快的审查
当您想要最快的扫描时，粘贴公开的 Spotify 播放列表 URL。如果播放列表是私有的或协作的，请先连接 Spotify，然后使用您的帐户访问权限运行审查。
This playlist is not publicly readable. Use a public Spotify playlist link.
Workspace Preview
Paste a playlist link to populate the overview, review summary, evidence panels, and the embedded paid modules below.
播放列表摘要
The dashboard will fill with playlist metadata, review evidence, and action guidance once you run a scan.
Overview
1 link
Paste one Spotify playlist URL to populate the report.
Review Summary
3 states
Low, Moderate, or Elevated review outcomes.
Evidence
Explainable
Flags and notes stay tied to visible playlist signals.
建议的下一步
总体审查
Waiting for scan
置信度
Pending
Run a scan to unlock the next-step guidance
The tool will convert current playlist signals into a due-diligence recommendation your team can shortlist, pause, or escalate.
History
Paid
Saved scans and trend context live inside the dashboard.
Pitch Copy
Contextual
Pitch generation uses the current review as context.
Signals this workspace checks
History & trend panel
Paid keeps scan history in the workspace so teams can review changes over time and keep a documented trail.
Overview
1 link
Review Summary
3 states
Evidence
Explainable
History
Paid
Unlock history and saved review context
Paid adds saved scan history, repeat-scan context, and client-ready report framing inside the dashboard.
Unlock PaidThis tool is built for the moment when a team needs to decide whether a playlist is worth pitching, worth paying for, or worth escalating for manual review. It does not claim to confirm fraud. It organizes current playlist evidence into a documented due-diligence workflow.
Use the dashboard before you buy placement, pitch a curator, or include a playlist in a client-facing recommendation. The goal is to reduce avoidable campaign risk and force a review step before money or reputation is on the line.
The review focuses on visible playlist evidence such as metadata quality, duplicate density, artist concentration, availability issues, and high-risk wording in titles or descriptions. That keeps the output explainable for internal QA and client conversations.
The free layer gives a verdict, confidence level, and top review flags. Paid unlocks the deeper working material: saved history, fuller notes, client-ready reporting, and pitch generation that uses the current review as context.
This dashboard works best when you treat it as a pre-approval step before playlist outreach, paid placement, or client reporting.
Start with the exact playlist you are considering for a pitch, placement buy, or recommendation. Public playlists work immediately from the link.
Check whether the playlist lands in Low, Moderate, or Elevated review. That first verdict tells your team how much manual review is still needed.
Use the flags, policy wording checks, and manual notes to understand why the verdict was produced. The tool is meant to support due diligence, not replace judgment.
Use the review to move forward with the playlist, pause it for extra checking, or document why it should be removed from your shortlist.
The tool focuses on current playlist evidence that can be explained to a team, artist, or client instead of making black-box fraud claims.
Titles, descriptions, owner presentation, and other visible metadata are reviewed for low-quality or suspicious patterns.
The dashboard looks for unusual artist concentration, roster mismatch, and composition patterns that deserve extra human review.
Duplicate tracks, unavailable songs, repeated release patterns, and other maintenance issues are surfaced as explainable review flags.
Playlist title and description wording is checked against publicly risky promotional language such as guaranteed placement or guaranteed streams.
The strongest use case is the point where someone must approve a playlist target, document a recommendation, or stop a questionable placement before it becomes a problem.
Run candidate playlists through the dashboard before outreach starts so weak targets are filtered out before an artist or client sees them.
Use the review output as a written record of why a playlist was approved, paused, or escalated for more checking.
Agencies and consultants can use the structured notes to explain why a playlist belongs on a shortlist or why it should be excluded.
These are representative workflow moments, not promises about what every scan will find. They show how a team can use the tool before making a placement decision.
An artist pastes a playlist they were asked to pay for and sees multiple review flags tied to wording, duplication, and concentration signals.
Outcome: the playlist is paused for manual review before any money is spent.
A pitching team uses the dashboard to clean a shortlist and remove playlists that would be hard to defend in a client update.
Outcome: only the playlists with cleaner review profiles move into outreach.
A label scans candidate playlists so internal stakeholders can see the verdict, evidence, and saved history before approving budget.
Outcome: the campaign decision is easier to justify and easier to revisit later.
否。它突出显示支持手动审查的审查信号和尽职调查标志。
Spotify 不提供历史关注者 API。保存的扫描可以随着时间的推移积累历史记录。
Agency 客户可以导出面向客户的 PDF 报告。
否。代理机构从工作流程功能中获益最多，但唱片公司和艺术家也可以使用审查流程。
这意味着触发了多个审查标志，并且在推广前播放列表值得更仔细的手动审查。
否。这是一个尽职调查和活动质量保证工具，而不是一个确定的欺诈判决引擎。
它最适合在支付推广费用之前审查播放列表的代理机构、独立唱片公司和认真对待的艺术家。
免费用户每月可以运行最多 3 次扫描，并查看总体审查、置信度和前 3 个标志。
付费计划根据计划解锁完整的审查细节、保存的扫描历史记录以及代理级别的导出路径。
风险告诉您播放列表需要多少手动审查。置信度告诉您当前证据的完整性。
是的。该审查旨在支持活动质量保证、播放列表审批讨论以及在批准支出前进行记录的手动审查。
Agency 增加了面向客户的工作流程功能，例如白标导出、客户说明和活动文件夹组织，适用于代表他人管理推广的团队。